News & Articles

When Does a Primary Insurer Have a Duty to Advise an Insured of Potential Excess Policy Exposure

An insurance company’s duty to its insured does not end with the appointment of counsel.  Rather, it extends past that and requires a primary insurer keep their insured abreast of the litigation progress, status and, as described in length in R.C. Wegman Construction Co. v. Admiral Insurance Co., that there would be excess insurance exposure

The Illinois Business Corporation Act’s Survival Statute for Suits against Dissolved Corporations

In the recent case of Pielet v. Pielet, 365 Ill. Dec. 497 (Ill. 2012), the Illinois Supreme Court discussed when a plaintiff may sue a dissolved corporation under Section 12.80 of the Illinois Business Corporation Act, also referred to as the “Survival Statute.” In Pielet, the Pielets, a husband who died during the litigation and

Fiduciary Duties To Employers And Non-Competes

A recent Northern District of Illinois decision, Instant Tech., LLC v. DeFazio, 12 C 491, 2014 WL 1759184 (N.D. Ill. May 2, 2014), has shed some light on the applicability of non-solicitation, non-recruitment and non-disclosure covenants in Employment Agreements.  In Instant Tech, the court held that these types of restrictive covenants were unenforceable in certain

The Seventh Circuit’s Recent Opinions Upholding Dismissal of First Amendment Claims in Favor of the Government Entity’s Interest in Restricting Speech.

             In Volkman v. Ryker, 736 F.3d 1084 (7th Cir. 2013), the plaintiff, a correctional facility employee, filed suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging several Illinois Department of Corrections (“IDOC”) employees retaliated against him for engaging in protected speech.  More specifically, Volkman alleged that he was given a

Illinois Mortgagors Barred From Vacating A Judgement Of Foreclosure And Sale After The Mortgagee Files Its Motion To Confirm Sale

In Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. McCluskey, 2013 IL 115469 (Nov. 21, 2013), the Illinois Supreme Court clarified a perceived tension between the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure and the Illinois Mortgage Foreclosure Law (“IMFL”).  Specifically, section 5/2-1301(e)[1] of the Civil Code allows the court to set aside a default judgment against any party before

Can an Employer Have Employees Waive Their Rights to Pursue Litigation

In a move sure to please employers, the Fifth Circuit recently overturned the National Labor Relation Board’s ruling in D.R. Horton, Inc. v. NLRB.[1]  The case centered on whether an employer can require, as a condition of employment, an employee to waive his rights to pursue a class action complaint and instead to accept arbitration

Skip to content